Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    DCX2496 - Is it a good compromise vs a CX3400 + DEQ2496 pairing?

    Marshall.
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  2. #2
    Senior Hostboard Member bowtie427ss's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 24th, 2006
    Location
    Rural NY
    Posts
    3,901
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    26 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Only vs the CX3400 IMO. The DEQ is a very versatile unit itself and for some of us can even function as a useful stand alone basic analysis tool.

    The DCX while touting a parametric EQ function really only offers one band of EQ per output and input channel, and the extent to which you can push the parameters is very strictly limited by the amount of internal memory in use. Probably best to look at it as a crossover only, as it cannot really perform the function of a stand alone EQ, and certainly not one like the DEQ.

    Another thing to consider is that the DEQ can be connected to the DCX in the digital domain maintaining the minimum in A/D-D/A conversions.

    Just my .02....................
    Not all vegetables make good leaders.

  3. #3
    Senior Hostboard Member
    Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro


    Old Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 23rd, 2003
    Posts
    6,359
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    62 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    The DEQ/DCX combo is quite good however.

    D/A is where quality generally degrades, so straight digital between the two.

    Bear in mind the 96 kHz of the Behringer vs 48 for most units in that price range...
    Your neighbors called. They like your music.

  4. #4
    Senior Hostboard Member mah's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 28th, 2008
    Posts
    2,003
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Very helpful, guys.

    The DCX2496 is $AU230 more than the CX3400 at Downunder best prices. I guess I will have to look at the benefit of spending the extra amount, giving consideration to my ageing ears and whether they would benefit from the digital to digital transfer.

    The Luddite in me likes the fact that the CX3400 has KNOBS.

    Mmmm?, Marshall.
    Opinion is only as valid as its verifiable supporting evidence.

  5. #5
    Senior Hostboard Member Steve Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2006
    Posts
    732
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    18 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by mah View Post
    Very helpful, guys.

    The DCX2496 is $AU230 more than the CX3400 at Downunder best prices. I guess I will have to look at the benefit of spending the extra amount, giving consideration to my ageing ears and whether they would benefit from the digital to digital transfer.

    The Luddite in me likes the fact that the CX3400 has KNOBS.

    Mmmm?, Marshall.
    I'm pretty sure you would be intrigued at how easy the dcx is to operate...

  6. #6
    Senior Hostboard Member Panomaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 25th, 2006
    Posts
    1,811
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    1 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    The DCX is an amazing bit of kit. It does so much for so little money. Nothing else comes close. I also use the DEQ.

    The DCX is not without its problems, tho. A lot of that is the output circuits, they just don't sound great (and I have measurements to prove it). Fixing those is a whole cottage industry. The digital input and clock can be improved, as well as the power supply. All that will cost more than the DCX, maybe 3X more - but in the end you'll have a superb crossover/DAC that can do what no other can.

    Highest priority IMO is the analog outputs.

  7. #7
    Senior Hostboard Member Steve Mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 5th, 2006
    Posts
    732
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    18 Post(s)

    Re: Behringer DCX2496 Ultradrive Pro

    Quote Originally Posted by bowtie427ss View Post
    ...

    The DCX while touting a parametric EQ function really only offers one band of EQ per output and input channel, and the extent to which you can push the parameters is very strictly limited by the amount of internal memory in use. Probably best to look at it as a crossover only, as it cannot really perform the function of a stand alone EQ, and certainly not one like ...

    Just my .02....................
    My goodness...this is not true!
    Page 3...the parameter "NR", when highlighted...simply rotate the adjustment knob and a brand new band of EQ is added.

    I've had multiple bands, slopes and shelves on all outputs of a stereo three way setting and was able to do all required work to bring the multiple speakers/transducers into balance. This is why I have not had the need to add the DEQ.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This forum has been viewed: 28100561 times.